Main Article Content


In Latvia, the first commercial highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) plantings have been established on a few hectares at the end of the 1990th. Since then, a remarkable growth has noticed and today the total cultivated area reaches 280 hectares. An increasing market demand for fresh and processed berries provides a future upward trend in the development of blueberry crop in Latvia. In general, blueberry is a highly specialized crop that has definite soil agrochemical and climatic requirements. There are two main soil types used for blueberry cultivation in Latvia: well-drained acid sandy soils with high organic matter content and sphagnum peat soils. Evaluation and management of plant mineral nutrition in such diverse soils are based on guidelines for the particular type of growing medium. A long-term study (2006-2017, divided into three periods: 2006-2009, 2010-2013, 2014-2017) was done to find out the nutrient status of blueberry soils in Latvia.  In total, 330 mineral and peat soil samples were collected from the upper layer of soils (0 - 20 cm) across blueberry plantations in Latvia and tested on plant available nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Mo, B), as well as soil pHKCl and electrical conductivity. In general, more than 50% of blueberry soils had low content of N, S, Mo and B, as well as a high level of Mn over the study period of 2006-2017. Less than 25% of samples in the optimum range indicated on N as the most deficient nutrient.


Vaccinium corymbosum L plant available macro and micronutrients 1M HCl extraction

Article Details

How to Cite
Osvalde, A., Cekstere, G., Karlsons, A., & Pormale, J. (2019). DYNAMICS OF SOIL NUTRIENT STATUS OF HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY IN LATVIA, 2006-2017 . SWS Journal of EARTH and PLANETARY SCIENCES, 1(1), 38-48.


  1. Kaufmane A., Skrivele M., Ikase L. Fruit growing in Latvia – industry and science, Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Science, vol.71/issue 6, pp 237-247, 2017. DOI: 10.1515/prolas-2017-0040.
  2. Retamales J.B., Hancock J.F. Blueberries. Crop production science in horticulture 21, CABI, Cambridge, UK, 309 pp, 2012.
  3. Horneck D.A., Sullivan D.M., Owen J.S., Hart J.M. Soil Test Interpretation Guide, Oregon State University Extension service EC 1478, 12 pp, 2011.
  4. Strik B. Blueberry – an expanding world berry crop, Chronica Horticulturae, vol. 45/issue 1, pp 7-12, 2005.
  5. Rinkis G., Ramane H., Kunicka T. Methods of soil and plant analysis, Zinatne, Latvia, 174 pp, 1987 (in Russian).
  6. Nollendorfs V. Highbush blueberry soil and fertilization demands, Agropols, vol. 12, pp 8-10, 2004 (in Latvian).
  7. Mengel, K., Kirkby, E.A. Principles of plant nutrition. 5th edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp 849, 2001.
  8. Vargas O., Bryla D.R. Growth and fruit production of highbush blueberry fertilized with ammonium sulfate and urea applied by fertigation or as granular fertilizer, HortScience, vol. 50/issue 3, pp 479-485, 2015. DOI:
  9. Bryla D.R., Strik B., Bańados M.P., Righetti T.L. Response of highbush blueberry to nitrogen fertilizer during field establishment-II. Plant nutrient requirements in relation to nitrogen fertilizer supply. HortScience, vol. 47, pp 917-926, 2012.
  10. DOI:
  11. Komosa A., Roszyk J., Mieloch M. Content of nutrients in soils of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corumbosum L.) plantations in Poland in a long-term study, Journal of Elementology, vol. 22/issue 4, pp 1193-1207, 2017. DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2016.21.4.1329
  12. Hart J., Strik B., White L., Yang W. Nutrient management for blueberries in Oregon, Oregon State University Extension service EM 8918, 14 pp, 2006.
  13. Anonymous. Fertilizing blueberries, Spectrum Analytic Inc., 46 pp.
  14. Bryla D.R., Shireman A.D., Machado R.M.A. Effects of method and level of nitrogen fertilizer application on soil pH, electrical conductivity, and availability of ammonium and nitrate in blueberry. Acta Horticulturae, vol. 868, pp 95-101, 2010. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.868.8
  15. Patten K., Neuendorff E., Nimr G., Haby V., Wright, G. Cultural practices to reduce salinity/sodium damage of rabbiteye blueberry plants (Vaccinium ashei Reade). Acta Horticculturae, vol. 241, pp 207–212, 1989. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.241.33
  16. Grieve C.M., Grattan S.R., Maas E.V. 2012. Plant salt tolerance, pp 405–459. In: W.W. Wallender and K.K. Tanji (eds.). Agricultural salinity assessment and management. 2nd ed. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering No. 71. ASCE, Reston, VA, 2012.
  17. Osvalde A., Pormale J., Karlsons A, Cekstere, G. Differences in agrochemical characteristics of highbush blueberry peat and mineral soils in Latvia, 2011-2014. Proceedings of 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2015, vol. 2(3), pp 101-108, 2015. DOI: 10.5593/SGEM2015/B32/S13.014.
  18. Osvalde A., Karlsons A., Cekstere G., Pormale J., Apse J. Influence of soil type on nutrient status of highbush blueberry leaves in Latvia, 2013-2015. Acta Horticulturae, vol. 1217, pp 399-404, 2018. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1217.51
  19. Tasa T., Starast M., Vool E., Moor U., Karp, K. Influence of soil type on half-highbush blueberry productivity. Agricultural and Food Science, vol. 21, pp 409-420, 2012. DOI: