Main Article Content


In agriculture sector there is need for cheap, fast, and accurate data and technologies to help decision makers to find solutions for many agricultural problems. Many solutions depend significantly on the accuracy and efficiency of the crop mapping and crop yield estimation processes. High resolution spectral remote sensing can improve substantially crop mapping by reducing similarities between different crop types which has similar ecological conditions. This paper presents a new approach of combining a new tool, hyperspectral images and technologies to enhance crop mapping.  The tool includes spectral signatures database for the major crops in the Eastern Mediterranean Basin and other important metadata and processing functions. To prove the efficiency of the new approach, major crops such as “winter wheat” and “spring potato” are mapped using the spectral signatures database in the new tool, three different supervised algorithms, and CHRIS-Proba hyperspectral satellite images. The evaluation of the results showed that deploying different hyperspectral data and technologies can improve crop mapping. The improvements can be noticed with the increase of the accuracy to more than 86% with the use of the supervised algorithm Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM).


Crop mapping Spectral signature Hyperspectral Supervised Classification image processing Spectral Angle Mapper

Article Details

How to Cite


  1. A. Hueni, J. Nieke, J. Schopfer, M. Kneubuhler, K. Itten, “The spectral database SPECCHIO for improved long-term usability and data sharing”, Computers & Geosciences, vol. 35, pp. 557–565, 2009.
  2. SPECCHIO, A spectral information system, URL:, accessed 2nd of January 2017.
  3. Systems Ecology Laboratory, Vegetation Spectral Library, URL:, accessed 3rd of January 2017.
  4. M. Awad, “New mathematical models to estimate wheat leaf chlorophyll content based on Artificial Neural Network and remote sensing data”, in proceedings of IEEE International Multidisciplinary Conference on Engineering Technology (IMCET), 2-3 Nov. 2016, Beirut, Lebanon.
  5. M. Awad, Crop mapping using hyperspectral data and technologies - a comparison between different supervised segmentation algorithms, In the proceedings of 18 International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2018 30 June – 9 July, 2018, Albena, Bulgaria, vol. 18, issue:2.3, pp. 89-96
  6. C. Jones, P. Weckler, N. Maness, R. Jayasekara, Estimating Water Stress in Plants Using Hyperspectral Sensing, 2004 ASAE/CSAE Annual International Meeting, Ottawa, Canada, 1 - 4 August 2004,URL://, accessed Aug 2017.
  7. B. Yusuf, and Y. He, “Application of hyperspectral imaging sensor to differentiate between the moisture and reflectance of healthy and infected tobacco leaves”, African Journal of Agricultural Research vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 6267-6280, 2011.
  8. ENVI, Vegetation indices, URL: Accessed 15 May 2017.
  9. L. Serrano, J. Penuelas, and S. Ustin, "Remote Sensing of Nitrogen and Lignin in Mediterranean Vegetation from AVIRIS Data: Decomposing Biochemical from Structural Signals”, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 81, pp. 355-364, 2002.
  10. D. Haboudane, J. Millera, E. Patteyc, P. Zarco-Tejadad, I. Strachan, "Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices and Novel Algorithms for Predicting Green LAI of Crop Canopies: Modeling and Validation in the Context of Precision Agriculture", Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 90, pp. 337-352, 2004.
  11. J. Clevers, L. Kooistra, and J. van den Brande, Using Sentinel-2 Data for Retrieving LAI and Leaf and Canopy Chlorophyll Content of a Potato Crop, Remote Sensing Journal 2017, 9, 405; doi:10.3390/rs9050405. URL:// file:///C:/Users/new/Downloads/remotesensing-09-00405.pdf, accessed 17 Aug. 2017.
  12. L. Kooistra1, E. Beza, J. Verbesselt, J. van den Borne, and W. van der Velde, Integrating remote-, close range- and in-situ sensing for high frequency observation of crop status to support precision agriculture, Journal of Sensing a Changing World, 2012, URL://, accessed 17 Aug. 2017
  13. J. Eitel, D. Long, P. Gessler and A. Smith, University Idaho Using in‐situ measurements to evaluate the new RapidEye™ satellite series for prediction of wheat nitrogen status, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 28, no.18, Pp. 4183-4190
  14. G. Wenxia, S. Huanfeng, Z. Liangpei and G. Wei, Normalization of NDVI from Different Sensor System using MODIS Products as Reference, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 17, 2014.
  15. P. Gege, J. Fries, P. Haschberger, “Calibration facility for airborne imaging spectrometers,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 387–397, 2009.
  16. L. Liao, P. Jarecke, D. Gleichauf, and T. Hedman, “Performance characterization of the hyperion imaging spectrometer instrument,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Optical Science and Technology, pp. 264–275, Aug. 2000.
  17. P. Mouroulis, R. O. Green, and T. G. Chrien, “Design of pushbroom imaging spectrometers for optimum recovery of spectroscopic and spatial information,” Applied Optics, vol. 39, no. 13, pp. 2210–2220, 2000.
  18. D. R. Hearn, “Characterization of instrument spectral resolution by the spectral modulation transfer function,” in Earth Observing Systems III, W. L. Barnes, Ed., Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 400–407, July 2002.
  19. H. J. Kunze, Introduction to Plasma Spectroscopy, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2009.
  20. Spectral Response Functions (SFR). Available at URL:, accessed 14 May 2017.
  21. J. Benediktson, P. Swain, O. Ersoy, and D. Hong, “Neural Network Approaches Versus Statistical Methods in Classification of Multisource Remote Sensing Data”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 540-551, 1990.
  22. P. Mather, B. Tso, Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data, 2nd Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2009, 376 pages.
  23. F. Kruse, A. Lefkoff, J. Boardman, K. Heidebrecht, A. Shapiro, P. Barloon, and A. Goetz, “The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive Visualization and Analysis of Imaging spectrometer Data.” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 44, p. 145 – 163, 1993.
  24. Brookmann Consult and Contributors, BEAM Toolbox, URL:, accessed 15 Feb. 2016.
  25. L. Gómez-Chova, L. Alonso, L. Guanter, G. Camps-Valls, J. Calpe, and J. Moreno, “Correction of systematic spatial noise in push-broom hyperspectral sensors: Application to CHRIS/PROBA images”, Applied Optics, vol. 47, no. 28, pp.46–60, 2008.
  26. L. Guanter, L. Alonso, and L. Moreno, “Methods for the surface reflectance retrieval from CHRIS/PROBA data over land and inland waters”, European Space Agency, (Special Publication) ESA SP, pp. 25–37, 2005.
  27. R. Kohavi, and F. Provost, Applied Research in Machine Learning. In Special Issue on Applications of Machine Learning and the Knowledge Discovery Process, Columbia University, New York, vol. 30, 1998.
  28. J. Cohen., “A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 20, pp. 37–46, 1960.
  29. J. Landis, G. Koch, “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data”, Biometrics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 159–174, 1977.